The miscellanea/cpus_are_not_samples job seems to be missing some engineering sample CPUs
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkbox Provider - Base |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Rod Smith |
Bug Description
Several certified systems, and systems being tested now, report their CPUs as being "Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000," which appears to be a code for an engineering sample, or possibly something with unpublished PCI IDs. Either way, this should be flagged by the test. Example systems include:
- HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9: http://
- HP ProLiant DL80 Gen9: http://
- HP ProLiant DL160 Gen9: http://
- HP ProLiant DL180 Gen9: http://
- HP ProLiant DL60 Gen9: http://
- HP ProLiant XL450 Gen9: http://
- HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2: http://
- Lenovo x3550 M5 w/v4 CPU: https:/
Related branches
- Jeff Lane : Approve
-
Diff: 11 lines (+1/-1)1 file modifiedproviders/plainbox-provider-checkbox/bin/dmitest (+1/-1)
Changed in checkbox-ng: | |
assignee: | nobody → Rod Smith (rodsmith) |
tags: | added: hwcert-server |
affects: | checkbox-ng → plainbox-provider-checkbox |
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
milestone: | none → 0.28 |
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Merge requested. Here's a sample run with the new script on the Lenovo with the suspected engineering sample CPUs:
https:/ /certification. canonical. com/hardware/ 201605- 22234/submissio n/110767/ test-results/
For comparison, here's a sample run on boysenberry, which has a production CPU:
https:/ /certification. canonical. com/hardware/ 201003- 5444/submission /110768/ test-results/