inconsistent use of id and summary in job descriptions

[Jeff Lane ]

Looking at several server tests, there is an inconsistent use of summary and id in job descriptions, so that some jobs are displayed using ID and some using summary. For example, this subset of the server full whitelist:
[X] - Ethernet Device tests │
│ [X] ethernet/detect │
│ [X] ethtool check for NIC eth0 │
│ [X] ethtool check for NIC eth1 │
│ [X] ethtool check for NIC eth2 │
│ [X] ethernet/info_automated │
│ [X] Multi-NIC Iperf3 testing for NIC eth0 │
│ [X] Multi-NIC Iperf3 testing for NIC eth1 │
│ [X] Multi-NIC Iperf3 testing for NIC eth2 │
│ [X] - Informational tests │
│ [X] Attach a copy of /proc/cpuinfo │
│ [X] Attach a copy of /var/log/dmesg │
│ [X] Attach a copy of /sys/class/dmi/id/* │
│ [X] Attach a copy of of the output of dmidecode │
│ [X] efi_attachment │
│ [X] info/disk_partitions │
│ [X] info/hdparm_sda.txt │
│ [X] info/kvm_output │
│ [X] lshw_attachment │
│ [X] Attach a list of currently running kernel modules │
│ [X] Attach a list of PCI devices │
│ [X] lsusb_attachment │
│ [X] meminfo_attachment │
│ [X] Attach the contents of modprobe configuration files │
│ [X] Attach the contents of /etc/modules │
│ [X] Attach sysctl configuration files. │
│ [X] Attach detailed sysfs property output from udev │
│ [X] Attach hardware database (udev)

Need to make the jobs more consistent.