Great Red Spot position when offset is given

Bug #1557738 reported by Michael Covington
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Stellarium
Fix Released
Low
Alexander Wolf

Bug Description

I am somewhat puzzled by line 718 of Planet.cpp and am wondering whether the call to qAbs is correct.

This is the routine for "drifting" the position of the Great Red Spot when an offset has been provided by the user.

The drift, apparently in degrees, seems to be 0.2483 * qAbs(JD - 2456172)

If I have understood it correctly, this seems to assert that the drift reversed direction in 2012. Other sources show a steady drift.

Also, I'm wondering about the coefficient 0.2483. The actual drift of the GRS is only about 0.04 degree per day relative to System II. The rest of the coefficient might come from the difference between System II (used for GRS measurements) and System III (used for the rotation period in ssystem.ini), but even then I'm not sure I understand its value.

Tags: solar-system
tags: added: solar-system
Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :

This is a legacy code to compensate for the drift of the GRS. I think we can use the approach of CdC planetarium and introduce explicit configurable options for the GRS as a special case.

P.S. Stellarium uses an inner coordinate system for all planets.

Revision history for this message
Michael Covington (a-mc) wrote :

Yes; now that you have the -1 option (compute position of GRS from scratch), I would advocate that when the user specifies anything other than -1, the offset should simply stay constant, as with any other planet, to keep from puzzling the user. This drift certainly puzzled me when I didn't know it was built in.

Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :

I deleted a outdated code for drift of GRS.

Changed in stellarium:
milestone: none → 0.15.0
assignee: nobody → Alexander Wolf (alexwolf)
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Michael Covington (a-mc) wrote :

Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Michael Covington (a-mc) wrote :

By the way, I fully support your decision to use System III. It is the most physically real of the three coordinate systems. The other two are basically moving longitude systems that try to track different parts of the atmosphere. System II, as I understand it, was originally intended to track the Great Red Spot, but...

Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :

Since version 0.14.80.0 you can fill settings for GRS in GUI.

Revision history for this message
Michael Covington (a-mc) wrote : Re: [Bug 1557738] Re: Great Red Spot position when offset is given

Thanks!

On 2016-04-09 03:41, Alexander Wolf wrote:
> Since version 0.14.80.0 you can fill settings for GRS in GUI.
>

--
Michael A. Covington, Ph.D.
Consultant, Covington Innovations, Athens, Georgia, USA
http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/michael

Changed in stellarium:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.