fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core module failed to build for xenia kernel (generic and lowlatency)

Bug #1553434 reported by Dave
20
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
fglrx-installer-updates (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Not sure if apport-bug includes the following info, so I'll include the compile error just in case it doesn't.

Note: the module does build on the -wily kernels.

Hardware: Toshiba Sattellite A300-1M9, a fantastic laptop built in 2008. They don't build 'em like that anymore. But it has more features in it than today's laptops.

But anyway. Lest I turn it into a sales pitch, here's the compile error from dkms:

 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function ‘firegl_major_proc_read’:
 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:639:9: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
      len = seq_printf(m, "%d\n", major);
          ^
 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_fpu_save_init’:
 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:6508:49: error: ‘XSTATE_FP’ undeclared (first use in this function)
        if (!(fpu->state.xsave.header.xfeatures & XSTATE_FP))
                                                  ^
 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:6508:49: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: At top level:
 /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:6498:12: warning: ‘KCL_fpu_save_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
  static int KCL_fpu_save_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
             ^
 make[2]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.o] Error 1

Cheers.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-9.24~14.04.1~beta1-generic 4.4.3
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-9-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelVersion: 4.4.0-9-generic
Date: Sat Mar 5 02:33:09 2016
DuplicateSignature: dkms:fglrx-updates-core:2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1:/var/lib/dkms/fglrx-updates-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:639:9: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
PackageVersion: 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.5
 apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.11
SourcePackage: fglrx-installer-updates
Title: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core kernel module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Dave (aenima-5) wrote :
tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in fglrx-installer-updates (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1502978, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.

Revision history for this message
KitchM (tech-frontrowcomputer) wrote :

This is the location the bug reporting takes me to. Are you sure this is a duplicate?

Revision history for this message
KitchM (tech-frontrowcomputer) wrote :

Same thing happened again. Why is this still marked as a duplicate? Is this indicative of another flaw in the system?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.