package firefox 44.0.1+build2-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so' to '/usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
firefox (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
???
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: firefox 44.0.1+
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-
AddonCompatChec
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/
BuildID: 20160206220319
Channel: Unavailable
Date: Sat Feb 13 13:58:40 2016
DuplicateSignature: package:
ErrorMessage: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
# interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-11-30 (75 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140722.1)
IpRoute:
default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 proto static
10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.10 metric 1
IwConfig:
lo no wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
NoProfiles: True
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageV
dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.5
apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.11
RfKill:
RunningIncompat
SourcePackage: firefox
Title: package firefox 44.0.1+
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/04/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2.1.0
dmi.board.name: 0WF810
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 15
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.
dmi.product.name: OptiPlex 745
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
tags: | removed: need-duplicate-check |
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.