gvfsd-metadata crashed, signal 7, NFS-Home

Bug #1524625 reported by Lukas
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Edit Remove
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi there,

This application crashes frequently on many of our linux clients which are using a graphical Filemanager like Nemo, Nautilus, Thunar ...

We are using an NFS-mount as homepath.

This bug occurs on various Ubuntu versions, with different desktop environments like Unity, Cinnamon, Mate, LXDE, XFCE

I already straced it but it didn't crash while doing so.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
Package: gvfs-daemons 1.24.2-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-19.23-generic 4.2.6
Uname: Linux 4.2.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Wed Dec 9 08:37:41 2015
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata
ExecutableTimestamp: 1444989433
JournalErrors:
 No journal files were found.
 -- No entries --
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata
ProcCwd: /
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANGUAGE=de_DE
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
Signal: 7
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: gvfsd-metadata crashed with signal 7
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: employee rzcip-m sudo

Revision history for this message
Lukas (lukas-wringer) wrote :
tags: added: trusty utopic vivid
Lukas (lukas-wringer)
information type: Private → Public Security
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote : Bug is not a security issue

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Public Security → Public
Revision history for this message
Lukas (lukas-wringer) wrote :

it was marked as private by apport, i thought "public security" only meant sth like restricted view for public. I'm new to this.

Sorry for my english

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
  • Duplicate of a private bug Remove

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.