["Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS" 2.22-110~juno] vrouter core seen - VRF delete timeout

Bug #1519743 reported by Ganesha HV
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Juniper Openstack
Invalid
High
Hari Prasad Killi
R2.20
Fix Committed
High
Hari Prasad Killi

Bug Description

Build : 2.22-110
CoreLocation : /cs-shared/test_runs/nodeb8/2015_11_24_14_10_20
cores : {'10.204.216.201': ['core.contrail-vroute.3332.nodeb8.1448359932']}
LogsLocation : http://10.204.216.50/Docs/logs/2.22-110_2015_11_24_14_10_20/logs/
Report : http://10.204.216.50/Docs/logs/2.22-110_2015_11_24_14_10_20/junit-noframes.html
Topology :
Config Nodes : [u'nodeb8']
Control Nodes : [u'nodeb8']
Compute Nodes : [u'nodeb8']
Openstack Node : nodeb8
WebUI Node : nodeb8
Analytics Nodes : [u'nodeb8']
Physical Devices : [u"'mx1'"]

BT
===
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/contrail-vrouter-agent'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 0x00007ff443241cc9 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6)
    at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
#0 0x00007ff443241cc9 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6)
    at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
#1 0x00007ff4432450d8 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2 0x00007ff44323ab86 in __assert_fail_base (
    fmt=0x7ff44338b830 "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n",
    assertion=assertion@entry=0x1051f35 "0",
    file=file@entry=0x10602e0 "controller/src/vnsw/agent/oper/vrf.cc",
    line=line@entry=333,
    function=function@entry=0x10604a0 "bool VrfEntry::DeleteTimeout()")
    at assert.c:92
#3 0x00007ff44323ac32 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x1051f35 "0",
    file=0x10602e0 "controller/src/vnsw/agent/oper/vrf.cc", line=333,
    function=0x10604a0 "bool VrfEntry::DeleteTimeout()") at assert.c:101
#4 0x00000000009f031d in VrfEntry::DeleteTimeout() ()
#5 0x000000000101be59 in Timer::TimerTask::Run() ()
#6 0x0000000001015850 in TaskImpl::execute() ()
#7 0x00007ff443e10b3a in ?? () from /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2
#8 0x00007ff443e0c816 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2
#9 0x00007ff443e0bf4b in ?? () from /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2
#10 0x00007ff443e080ff in ?? () from /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2
#11 0x00007ff443e082f9 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2
#12 0x00007ff44402c182 in start_thread (arg=0x7ff42ffff700)
    at pthread_create.c:312
#13 0x00007ff44330547d in clone ()
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:111

Ganesha HV (ganeshahv)
Changed in juniperopenstack:
milestone: r2.22 → none
no longer affects: juniperopenstack/r2.21.x
tags: added: blocker
Changed in juniperopenstack:
milestone: none → r3.0-fcs
Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R2.20

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/15450
Submitter: Hari Prasad Killi (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/15450
Committed: http://github.org/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/a316f05ca24d7ad3fcd158468bb82816a879d07c
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: R2.20

commit a316f05ca24d7ad3fcd158468bb82816a879d07c
Author: Hari <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:18:24 2015 +0530

Use the correct flow handler task instance.

Change-Id: If8ce2785478f944045b026f58ced7cd7ff1f452d
closes-bug: 1519743

information type: Proprietary → Public
Revision history for this message
Hari Prasad Killi (haripk) wrote :

This issue is not present in mainline.

Changed in juniperopenstack:
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.