Max partitions vs. disks in Operational considerations in OpenStack Architecture Design Guide
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
openstack-manuals |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Michael Glaser |
Bug Description
The document reads:
"... it is important to determine the maximum partition power required by the Object Storage service, which determines the maximum number of partitions which can exist. Object Storage distributes data among all available storage, but a partition cannot span more than one disk, so the maximum number of partitions can only be as high as the number of disks."
The last statement doesn't seem correct because you *can* have much more partitions than disks; e.g. one disk and eight partitions if the partition power is 3, as described in the very next paragraph.
Should that be the other way around? Ie. the maximum number of disks can only be as high as the number of partitions? Or is the maximum number of partitions limited in some other way?
-------
Built: 2015-11-04T18:05:02 00:00
git SHA: 631b53aa1f5d3f9
URL: http://
source File: file:/home/
xml:id: operational-
Changed in openstack-manuals: | |
assignee: | nobody → KALYANI (kalyani030592) |
Changed in openstack-manuals: | |
milestone: | mitaka → newton |
Changed in openstack-manuals: | |
milestone: | newton → ocata |
Changed in openstack-manuals: | |
assignee: | nobody → Michael Glaser (mikeg451) |
Changed in openstack-manuals: | |
milestone: | none → ocata |
Also, instead of 2^3, please consider using 2<superscript> 3</superscript> . The same applies to 2^10, too.