installation does need /usr/share/texmf-tetex/

Bug #148941 reported by Oxenfrogga
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
cedilla (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Dear everyone,

I'm running todays gutsy and cedilla gives an error report because it can't find the fonts:

***********************

oxi:~ > cat tst.txt
huhuhahjklsad
oxi:~ > cedilla tst.txt
WARNING: Unable to read AFM file /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/afm/adobe/courier/pcrr8a.afm:
         nonexistent directory: #P"/usr/share/texmf-tetex/"

WARNING: Unable to read AFM file /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/afm/adobe/symbol/psyr.afm:
         nonexistent directory: #P"/usr/share/texmf-tetex/"

WARNING: Unable to read AFM file /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/afm/adobe/zapfding/pzdr.afm:
         nonexistent directory: #P"/usr/share/texmf-tetex/"

Cedilla: Empty document.
oxi:~ >
**********************

I have this tetex packages installed:

**********************
oxi:~ > dpkg -l|grep tetex
ii tetex-base 2007-10 TeX Live: teTeX transitional package
ii tetex-bin 2007-10 TeX Live: teTeX transitional package
rc tetex-doc 3.0.dfsg.3-4 The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packag
ii tetex-doc-nonfree 1.1 teTeX documentation that is non-free
ii tetex-extra 2007-10 TeX Live: teTeX transitional package
oxi:~ >
************************

An easy workaround is:
**********************
oxi:~ > cd /usr/share/
oxi:/usr/share > sudo ln -s texmf-texlive/ texmf-tetex
**********************

.... and everything works like expected!

Thanks,
Harald

Revision history for this message
AleksanderAdamowski (aadamowski) wrote :

Also, the cedilla package should depend on the package that provides those fonts so that apt-get install them.

The package that contains required fonts is "texlive-fonts-recommended".

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 RC or later?

Changed in cedilla:
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report you can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change the Status back to New. Thanks again!.

Changed in cedilla:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.