Need a job firmware/fwts_desktop_diagnosis_hwe
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkbox Provider - Base |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Po-Hsu Lin | ||
Provider for Plainbox - Canonical Certification (Legacy) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Po-Hsu Lin |
Bug Description
Alex@HWE proposed to separate fwts logs into 2 parts, one is results_oem.log for OEM and the other is results_hwe.log for HWE.
Their expectation is that, if the failures are related to OEM and in results_oem.log, QA file bug and asing to PM directly, no need HWE's analysis. And once the failures need HWE's analysis (in results_hwe.log), QA file bug and assign to engineering TL.
In new release plainbox-
I think we need two separate jobs/tests for fwts test. When test(s) fail, QA can clearly know who should the bug(s) assign to.
Test to Run in FWTS and identify which test results need HWE to analysis
https:/
Related branches
- Sylvain Pineau (community): Approve
- Jeff Lane : Approve
-
Diff: 166 lines (+59/-31)2 files modifiedproviders/plainbox-provider-checkbox/bin/fwts_test (+41/-26)
providers/plainbox-provider-checkbox/jobs/firmware.txt.in (+18/-5)
tags: | added: ce-qa-concern |
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
assignee: | nobody → Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
status: | New → In Progress |
assignee: | nobody → Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
milestone: | none → 0.22 |
Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Changed in plainbox-provider-canonical-certification: | |
milestone: | none → 0.19 |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Call it a wishlist since it looks like a feature request.