[R2.20]DM: use VNID for IRB interface rather than VxLAN ID
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juniper Openstack | Status tracked in Trunk | |||||
R2.20 |
Fix Committed
|
High
|
Suresh Balineni | |||
Trunk |
Fix Committed
|
High
|
Suresh Balineni |
Bug Description
Using the VxLAN id for numbering the IRB interface is not a good idea as the legal junos interface-range tops out at 16k.
Figure out a scheme such that we pick an available number within the valid interface-range. Could use the same that is used for si-*.
VxLAN id of 50000 was configured. Resulting config:
_contrail_
vtep-
instance-type virtual-switch;
vrf-import _contrail_
vrf-export _contrail_
protocols {
evpn {
}
}
bridge-domains {
bd-500000 {
vlan-id none;
vxlan {
vni 500000;
}
}
}
root@cmbu-tasman# commit check
error: 'irb.50000' is not a valid interface-range or alias name
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
information type: | Proprietary → Public |
Review in progress for https:/ /review. opencontrail. org/12044
Submitter: Suresh Balineni (<email address hidden>)