On Tor scale setup, dhcp fails for endpoints

Bug #1453698 reported by Vedamurthy Joshi
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Juniper Openstack
Status tracked in Trunk
R2.20
Fix Committed
High
Praveen
Trunk
Fix Committed
High
Praveen

Bug Description

R2.20 Build 13 Ubuntu 14.04 Juno multinode setup

In this tor-scale setup, we have 128 TORs, 512 lifs on each tor, 2 vmis on each lif.
Each lif is part of different Vn (512 vns in all)

Totally,
128 tors
64K lifs
128K vmis
512 vns

nodei38 is the node which houses all these tor-agents

On ovs-vm1 (first ToR), an endpoint tried to do dhcp . The packet reaches the TSN, but no response is got

Praveen is aware of the issue

Tags: bms scale vrouter
Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : R2.20

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/10170
Submitter: Praveen K V (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/10170
Committed: http://github.org/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/2b75e9ed53e70e595e6f420e27e2860e539dd8ea
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: R2.20

commit 2b75e9ed53e70e595e6f420e27e2860e539dd8ea
Author: Praveen K V <email address hidden>
Date: Mon May 11 16:48:08 2015 +0530

Support for >64K VMI and VRF

Few data structures in agent were using uint16_t to store VMI and VRF
index. Modified to use uint32_t

Closes-bug: #1453698
Change-Id: Ic10fd3beeaa286675bf49bfd35da4de4415ed9ae

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/10227
Submitter: Praveen K V (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/10227
Committed: http://github.org/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/b2984f540dd8c2697603dda5d245bc1106ce2dd0
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: master

commit b2984f540dd8c2697603dda5d245bc1106ce2dd0
Author: Praveen K V <email address hidden>
Date: Mon May 11 16:48:08 2015 +0530

Support for >64K VMI and VRF

Few data structures in agent were using uint16_t to store VMI and VRF
index. Modified to use uint32_t

Closes-bug: #1453698
Change-Id: Ic10fd3beeaa286675bf49bfd35da4de4415ed9ae

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.