python2.4-samba shared libs too big?

Bug #14424 reported by Andrew Bennetts
8
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
samba (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Ubuntu Server

Bug Description

Something fishy is going on with the samba Python bindings:

$ ls -1shd `dpkg -L python2.4-samba | grep .so$`
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/lsa.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/samr.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/smb.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/spoolss.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/srvsvc.so
 16K /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/tdbpack.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/tdb.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/winbind.so
1.5M /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/samba/winreg.so

I strongly suspect that these .so files don't all need to be 1.5M.

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Presumably they're all linking with a private, static library within the samba
source tree. There isn't much to be done about this other than converting it
into a proper shared library, which isn't something we're likely to do without
upstream's lead

Changed in samba:
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Changed in samba:
assignee: adconrad → ubuntu-server
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and help improve Ubuntu.

The python samba bindings are deprecated upstream, and have been dropped from the Ubuntu packaging as of gutsy. This bug is therefore no longer an issue.

Changed in samba:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.