[ostf] Murano apache tests failed with message environment has incorrect status deploy failure

Bug #1438704 reported by Tatyanka
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Fuel for OpenStack
Invalid
Medium
Victor Ryzhenkin
6.0.x
Won't Fix
Medium
Victor Ryzhenkin

Bug Description

http://172.18.66.221:8080/view/6.0_swarm/job/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/101/testReport/junit/%28root%29/deploy_murano_simple_gre/deploy_murano_simple_gre/

deploy_murano_simple_gre.deploy_murano_simple_gre (from nosetests)
Failing for the past 6 builds (Since Failed#96 )
Took 41 min.
add description
Error Message

The following tests have not succeeded, while they must have passed: [u'Check that user can deploy Apache service in Murano environment (fuel_health.tests.platform_tests.test_platform_murano_linux.MuranoDeployLinuxServicesTests.test_deploy_apache_service). Test status: failure, message: Environment has incorrect status deploy failure . Please refer to OpenStack logs for more details.']

Stacktrace

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 331, in run
    testMethod()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 1043, in runTest
    self._testFunc()
  File "/home/jenkins/venv-nailgun-tests/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/proboscis/case.py", line 296, in testng_method_mistake_capture_func
    compatability.capture_type_error(s_func)
  File "/home/jenkins/venv-nailgun-tests/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/proboscis/compatability/exceptions_2_6.py", line 27, in capture_type_error
    func()
  File "/home/jenkins/venv-nailgun-tests/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/proboscis/case.py", line 350, in func
    func(test_case.state.get_state())
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/fuelweb_test/helpers/decorators.py", line 60, in wrapper
    return func(*args, **kwagrs)
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/fuelweb_test/tests/test_services.py", line 354, in deploy_murano_simple_gre
    test_name=test_name, timeout=60 * 36)
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/fuelweb_test/__init__.py", line 48, in wrapped
    result = func(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/fuelweb_test/models/fuel_web_client.py", line 597, in run_single_ostf_test
    timeout=timeout)
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/fuelweb_test/__init__.py", line 48, in wrapped
    result = func(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/6.0_fuelmain.system_test.centos.services_simple/fuelweb_test/models/fuel_web_client.py", line 149, in assert_ostf_run_certain
    'must have passed: %s' % fail_details)
  File "/home/jenkins/venv-nailgun-tests/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/proboscis/asserts.py", line 163, in assert_true
    raise ASSERTION_ERROR(message)
AssertionError: The following tests have not succeeded, while they must have passed: [u'Check that user can deploy Apache service in Murano environment (fuel_health.tests.platform_tests.test_platform_murano_linux.MuranoDeployLinuxServicesTests.test_deploy_apache_service). Test status: failure, message: Environment has incorrect status deploy failure . Please refer to OpenStack logs for more details.']

Tags: ostf
description: updated
Changed in fuel:
milestone: 6.0.1 → 6.1
Changed in fuel:
assignee: Timur Nurlygayanov (tnurlygayanov) → Victor Ryzhenkin (vryzhenkin)
Changed in fuel:
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Victor Ryzhenkin (vryzhenkin) wrote :

I was inspected this problem with the reverted snapshot.
The root of the failure is slow host. We have encountered same errors in the packtest jobs.
Instance works very slow and deploy failed because of agent on instance don't report.

So, for example, i spent more that five minuted before i've got ssh to instance.
I'm think, we need to get Hardware compute for this tests...

Revision history for this message
Sergey Kraynev (skraynev) wrote :

Please check it on 6.0.1 and update status if need to Invalid

Revision history for this message
Vitaly Sedelnik (vsedelnik) wrote :

Won't Fix for 6.0-updates because of Medium importance

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.