merge command should have --change option
Bug #141368 reported by
Alexander Belchenko
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bazaar |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Alexander Belchenko | ||
Bug Description
Now `diff` and `status` commands have --change (-c) option to specify changes introduced by one specific revision.
`Merge` command also should have such option for cherrypicking.
Revision history for this message
| Aaron Bentley (abentley) wrote Re: [Bug 141368] merge command should have --change option | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in bzr: | |
| assignee: | nobody → bialix |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
| status: | New → In Progress |
Revision history for this message
| Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote Re: [Bug 141368] Re: merge command should have --change option | #3 |
| Changed in bzr: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Now `diff` and `status` commands have --change (-c) option to specify changes introduced by one specific revision.
> `Merge` command also should have such option for cherrypicking.
Fully agreed. Do you feel like writing it?
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFG80z60F+
4Bo8NDU0anSsy/
=wrbs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----