regression: position display doesn't show negative numbers
Bug #1411771 reported by
Ferran Pujol
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixxx |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Mixxx allows the play-head to be virtually at negative samples respect track's sample 0. This is nice, however, if you try to seek too far away the deck freezes.
There should be a reasonable limit on how far the user can seek back.
Revision history for this message
| RJ Skerry-Ryan (rryan) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in mixxx: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
Revision history for this message
| Ferran Pujol (ferranpujol) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in mixxx: | |
| status: | New → Invalid |
Revision history for this message
| RJ Skerry-Ryan (rryan) wrote | #3 |
| summary: |
- Seeking back far before sample zero freezes deck + regression: position display doesn't show negative numbers |
| Changed in mixxx: | |
| milestone: | none → 1.12.0 |
| status: | Invalid → Confirmed |
Revision history for this message
| Owen Williams (ywwg) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in mixxx: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
Revision history for this message
| Owen Williams (ywwg) wrote | #5 |
| Changed in mixxx: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Revision history for this message
| Swiftb0y (swiftb0y) wrote | #6 |
| lock status: | Metadata changes locked and limited to project staff |
To post a comment you must log in.
How far back do you have to go? So the deck stops moving forward if you go back far enough?