Swift terminology implies separate Swift nodes

[Meg McRoberts]

Mike writes: Fuel doesn't deploy standalone Swift nodes.
Swift is used only on controllers. So you are correct, you can add more Swift capacity by adding more controllers. We have been considering considering making separate swift role, though it never happened to get resources for it.

This is not what the Swift terminology article implies; the article needs to be corrected.

[OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)]

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/133600

[OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack)]

Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/133600
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/fuel-docs/commit/?id=3d8c583866ab2936e22a23f944cb71ed67cd46bd
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master

commit 3d8c583866ab2936e22a23f944cb71ed67cd46bd
Author: Meg McRoberts <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Nov 10 18:13:26 2014 -0800

    Swift installs only on Controller nodes

    The Swift docs did not explicitly state that Swift can only
    be installed on Controller nodes This is added to the Terminology
    article and to the list of planning considerations.

    Closes-Bug: 1391308

    Change-Id: I84f4ab991e8cdaac6dea5f63312232e6a6a0936b