Licensing is inconsistent

[Robie Basak]

In 1.20.7, I see the following licensing inconsistencies. These are, AIUI, permissible, and not a problem, but you may want to align them with everything else for consistency. If all copyright holders (everyone who has contributed to these files, or signed the CLA so Canonical can make a decision for them) agree, then you can change the licence to match the AGPL-3 like everything else.

These are licensed under the LGPL-3:

src/github.com/juju/juju/arch/package_test.go
src/github.com/juju/juju/container/export_test.go
src/github.com/juju/juju/container/lock_test.go
src/github.com/juju/juju/version/ubuntu/package_test.go

src/github.com/juju/juju/etc/bash_completion.d/juju-core is licensed under the GPL-3.

For completeness, I note that src/github.com/juju/juju/scripts/win-installer/modpath.iss is licensed by Jared Breland <email address hidden> under the LGPL-3, so I presume this cannot be changed without his permission.

[Ian Booth (wallyworld)]

The shell script src/github.com/juju/juju/etc/bash_completion.d/juju-core should stay as GPLv3 - it doesn't make any sense for that to be AGPL.