Please backport sosreport 3.1-1ubuntu2 (main) from trusty

Bug #1339592 reported by Dimitri John Ledkov
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Precise Backports
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Please backport sosreport 3.1-1ubuntu2 (main) from trusty to precise.

Reason for the backport:
========================
* New upstream release
* New plugins
* Improved OpenStack plugins
* Python3 support
* Security fixes

Testing:
========
Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but please leave the checklist so that backporters can quickly evaluate the state of testing.

You can test-build the backport in your PPA with backportpackage:
$ backportpackage -u ppa:<lp username>/<ppa name> -s trusty -d precise sosreport

* precise:
[ ] Package builds without modification
[ ] sosreport installs cleanly and runs

No reverse dependencies

Revision history for this message
Iain Lane (laney) wrote :

They want to backport the trusty SRU, which is in unapproved currently.

This build-depends on dh-python which Precise doesn't have.

Changed in precise-backports:
status: New → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote :

There is no ongoing trusty SRU for sosreport, and no sosreport in trusty unapproved.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=sosreport

This bugreport is for tracking purposes, and is being worked on. Hence the two ticks are not marked as done yet, for "builds without modification" and "installs cleanly and runs".

Changed in precise-backports:
assignee: nobody → Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox)
Revision history for this message
Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote :

Can the bug status be reverted back to New please?

Revision history for this message
Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote :

(this is not a "Confirmed" backport, and thus is not ready for review by Backports team yet.)

Revision history for this message
Iain Lane (laney) wrote : Re: [Bug 1339592] Re: Please backport sosreport 3.1-1ubuntu2 (main) from trusty

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:10:30AM -0000, Iain Lane wrote:
> They want to backport the trusty SRU, which is in unapproved currently.

I meant Saucy.

I have actually been talking to cairbou about this, and sponsored the
SRU that's going to be backported, so I'm a bit surprised to see this
one pop up.

--
Iain Lane [ <email address hidden> ]
Debian Developer [ <email address hidden> ]
Ubuntu Developer [ <email address hidden> ]

Revision history for this message
Louis Bouchard (louis) wrote :

Indeed this is a follow up from the Saucy's SRU & backport request.

Saucy will be EOL in a few days. This request is to take care of the future so sosreport in Precise does not goes incredibly out of sync

Revision history for this message
Iain Lane (laney) wrote :

It sat around in the SRU queue for long enough that saucy went EOL and now we can't go down this route.

So we have to figure out the source change backport route.

Changed in precise-backports:
status: Won't Fix → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Louis Bouchard (louis) wrote :

This is ridiculous; this package has been uploaded twice and yet nothing happened. We will find a better way to get fixes to sosreport without waiting ages

Changed in precise-backports:
assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) → nobody
Revision history for this message
Louis Bouchard (louis) wrote :

No longer a valid request, sosreport 3.2 is now available. Marking it Invalid.

Changed in precise-backports:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.