[library] ruby 2.1 support on deployed nodes

[Andrew Woodward]

We appear to have ruby 2.1 support in the manifests now and we have moved up to puppet 3.4.2 but we are still installing 1.8.7

as a note, ruby 2.1 is already installed on the fuel node.

[Mike Scherbakov (mihgen)]

Vladimir Sharshov was working on this. Issue is mostly in package, as far as I know - it was complicated to build all required packages for Ubuntu. There are minor issues in puppet manifests too. So we considered to move this to 5.1.
I'll allow Roman Vyalov and Vladimir to comment on this.

[Bogdan Dobrelya (bogdando)]

Ruby 1.8.7 comes as a part of the Linux distribution, and I believe it should stay as is

[Nastya Urlapova (aurlapova)]

Guys, could you set one correct state for 6.1

[Aleksandr Didenko (adidenko)]

In Fuel-7.0 we have ubuntu 14.04 with ruby-1.9.3.4 and Fuel master node with ruby-2.1. We're not going to support CentOS-6.5 in Fuel-7.0, so I'm marking it as invalid for 7.0 and moving to 'future' release.

[Mike Scherbakov (mihgen)]

Please always assign to the next milestone, not to the "future"

[Artem Silenkov (asilenkov)]

Ok I'm starting this activity for 8.0

We have ruby2.0 there bit it should be ok.

[Artem Silenkov (asilenkov)]

 We have ruby 2.0 and related packages landed into 8.0 centos7.

http://perestroika-repo-tst.infra.mirantis.net/mos-repos/centos/mos8.0-centos7-fuel/os/x86_64/Packages/ruby-2.0.0.598-26.el7~mos8.0.1.x86_64.rpm

rubygems* are there too.

[Artem Silenkov (asilenkov)]

We had to patch it for centos7 because of https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10568.
Ubuntu is already using 2.0 from upstream.

[Aleksei Stepanov (penguinolog)]

test for issue (last comment) not causes segmentation fault on fuel-8.0-518-2016-02-03_07-53-27.iso and ruby version is:
ruby 2.0.0p598 (2014-11-13) [x86_64-linux]