evolution-source-registry crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

Bug #1303122 reported by Eugene Lazutkin
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
evolution-data-server (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Crashed when I was away, and the workstation was locked.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: evolution-data-server 3.10.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-22.44-generic 3.13.8
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-22-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sat Apr 5 12:41:25 2014
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-03 (2 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry
ProcEnviron:
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7fd7e570928a <g_slice_alloc+154>: mov 0x8(%rdx),%rbx
 PC (0x7fd7e570928a) ok
 source "0x8(%rdx)" (0x1e8d0f008) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rbx" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
StacktraceTop:
 g_slice_alloc () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_new_from_bytes () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
Title: evolution-source-registry crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Eugene Lazutkin (eugene-lazutkin-gmail) wrote :
information type: Private → Public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1235177, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.