package linux-image-3.5.0-44-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './boot/System.map-3.5.0-44-generic' to '/boot/System.map-3.5.0-44-generic.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
not sure what the problem is I am new to ubuntu
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: linux-image-
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/
CurrentDmesg:
[ 5720.073418] python3[10129]: segfault at 10055 ip 0811fe8b sp bfb80930 error 4 in python3.
[ 5755.725747] lsb_release[10136]: segfault at 6f20666c ip 6f20666c sp bf899d5c error 14
Date: Tue Dec 24 10:58:13 2013
ErrorMessage: cannot copy extracted data for './boot/
HibernationDevice: RESUME=
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release i386 (20121017.2)
MachineType: Gateway 945GCT-M3
ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageV
RfKill:
0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog:
Dec 24 11:38:33 bigsmile542-
Dec 24 11:38:33 bigsmile542-
Dec 24 11:39:09 bigsmile542-
dmi.bios.date: 06/26/2007
dmi.bios.vendor: 945GCT-M3
dmi.bios.version: V1.07
dmi.board.name: 945GCT-M3
dmi.board.vendor: ELITEGROUP
dmi.board.version: 3.1
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gateway
dmi.chassis.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvn945GCT-
dmi.product.name: 945GCT-M3
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: Gateway
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.