[MIR] libsdl2
Bug #1256185 reported by
Ma Hsiao-chun
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libsdl2 (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
sndio (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
libsdl1.2 is already in main.
SDL upstream released 2.0.x version:
http://
So it's time to replace libsdl1.2 with libsdl2
Related branches
~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu:merge-6.0-impish
Merged
into
ubuntu/+source/qemu:debian/experimental
at
revision 6493b345c4c2e256a3328e2859f81932e12134a6
- Lucas Kanashiro (community): Approve
- Canonical Server packageset reviewers: Pending requested
- Canonical Server: Pending requested
-
Diff: 6801 lines (+6016/-43)19 files modifieddebian/changelog (+4449/-4)
debian/control (+96/-22)
debian/control-in (+67/-13)
debian/patches/build-most-modules-statically-hack.diff (+1/-1)
debian/patches/series (+6/-0)
debian/patches/ubuntu/define-ubuntu-machine-types.patch (+823/-0)
debian/patches/ubuntu/enable-svm-by-default.patch (+34/-0)
debian/patches/ubuntu/lp-1929926-target-s390x-Fix-translation-exception-on-illegal-in.patch (+101/-0)
debian/patches/ubuntu/pre-bionic-256k-ipxe-efi-roms.patch (+62/-0)
debian/qemu-block-extra.postinst (+59/-0)
debian/qemu-kvm-init (+89/-0)
debian/qemu-system-common.install (+1/-0)
debian/qemu-system-common.qemu-kvm.default (+8/-0)
debian/qemu-system-common.qemu-kvm.service (+16/-0)
debian/qemu-system-gui.install (+2/-0)
debian/qemu-system-x86.NEWS (+80/-0)
debian/qemu-system-x86.README.Debian (+47/-0)
debian/rules (+61/-3)
debian/run-qemu.mount (+14/-0)
Changed in libsdl2 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → New |
Changed in libsdl2 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
status: | In Progress → Incomplete |
To post a comment you must log in.
Good point! It would be nice to see us switch main over.
In terms of blockers, this needs a team bug subscriber. And it needs a MIR for tslib too.
But besides that, it looks pretty good. sdl1.2 was already in main, this has few bugs, is well maintained in Debian, we're in sync with Debian. It doesn't use a symbols file, but does explicitly use -V with 2.0.0, which makes sense.
I know that sdl1.2 is already in main, but I figure it would be nice to get security opinion on sdl2, so assigning to ubuntu-security for a quick look or at least a statement saying it doesn't need a quick look.