DetailsTab: Order of the periods from oldest to newest

Bug #1225354 reported by Annika Berger
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Geldliste
Invalid
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

As far as I am informed we planned to have the periods ordered from the latest (on the top) to the older ones (bottom). If I understand it right we now have it the other way round as the first box is labeled "11/2012".
It is not clear to me if the number in front of the year stands for the number of the pilling period, so it is in this case the 11th period in 2012 or for the month, with does not make sense if we have the period starting in the middle of a month or even lasting for more than a month.

Revision history for this message
Joshua Gleitze (joshua-gleitze) wrote :

I am not sure about the ordering. For me it was more logical to have older periods on the top, so that you go further in time when you scroll down.

If you think it should be other way round, please mark this bug as confirmed.

Apart from that, there is this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/geldliste/+bug/1225456 . So please choose the option that is more logical to you. Don’t worry about seeing the actual period first.

Changed in geldliste:
status: New → Incomplete
importance: Undecided → High
milestone: none → stable-0.1
Revision history for this message
Annika Berger (annika-c-berger) wrote :

Yes, you're right. I just forgot the automatic scrolling to the actual month.
So this bug is no real bug.

Changed in geldliste:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.