evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

Bug #1215088 reported by Stephen M. Webb
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Edit Remove
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
evolution-data-server (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Spontaneous crash a short while after reboot and login. Has happened more than once.

Evolution has never been run on this machine.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: evolution-data-server 3.8.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-3.7-generic 3.11.0-rc6
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-3-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Aug 21 12:49:25 2013
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-calendar-factory
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-09 (104 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-calendar-factory
ProcEnviron:
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f46be57380a <g_slice_alloc+154>: mov 0x8(%rdx),%rbx
 PC (0x7f46be57380a) ok
 source "0x8(%rdx)" (0x7f460000000a) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rbx" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
StacktraceTop:
 g_slice_alloc () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_new_dict_entry () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
Title: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm autopilot cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Stephen M. Webb (bregma) wrote :
information type: Private → Public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1214790, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
  • Duplicate of a private bug Remove

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.