Program "jupp" is unresponsive when invoked as "joe" .
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jupp (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Hi, Dear reader!
I am using 64-bit Ubuntu Linux 13.04 on x86_64 arch (PC Laptop).
"${HOME}/.joerc" is a regular empty file with proper permissions ( 0664 ).
I used to use "joe" on a regular basis and this program was just on purpose for my needs, but recently (when?) it broke.
Now, when I type "joe" on commandline, the text editor is useless: not even a key press echoes on the screen. Not even able to C^K-Z or C^K-X or C^K-Q.
But if I run the program as "jupp" it functions just right.
I am using "jupp" version v3.1jupp24 (Ubuntu 13.04 program version 3.1.24-1).
I experience the trouble whichever the terminal emulator I use, and in a "/usr/bin/screen" session too, and even on the bare Linux console.
Is this intended behavior (a feature, not a bug of course), or could we suspect bad detection of terminal capabilities?
Why the hell does "jupp" functions just right while "joe" is out-of-order? Unmaintained code?
In hope my bug report will prove useful.
Kind regards,
Valentin QUEQUET
Valentin Quequet dixit:
>"${HOME}/.joerc" is a regular empty file with proper permissions ( 0664
^^^^ ^^^^^^
If the file is empty, no configuration is available. You need
to delete it or make it a copy of /etc/jupp/joerc (if you use
joe from joe-jupp) or /etc/joe/joerc (if you use joe from joe);
preferably delete it as the system-wide copy gets used then
instead.
>Now, when I type "joe" on commandline, the text editor is useless: not
>even a key press echoes on the screen. Not even able to C^K-Z or C^K-X
>or C^K-Q.
Yes, obviously: if you type joe it first looks for ~/.joerc then
for /etc/jupp/joerc - if one of those exists, it uses it and not
the other. The joerc file contains all information, such as key
bindings, menus, etc.
>In hope my bug report will prove useful.
I'm afraid this counts as "don't do that then" style user error.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh