Include Synthetic Fiber Channel and a few other storage patches in Ubuntu 13.10
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Tim Gardner | ||
Saucy |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Tim Gardner |
Bug Description
Hi folks,
Please include the following code whenever Ubuntu 13.10 is installed on Hyper-V:
1) [SCSI] storvsc: Support FC devices
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <email address hidden>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <email address hidden>
has been added to the upstream scsi tree On branch "postmerge"
You can find it here:
2) [SCSI] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Increase the value of STORVSC_
Increase the value of STORVSC_
ringbuffer size can support this higher value.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <email address hidden>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <email address hidden>
has been added to the upstream scsi tree On branch "postmerge"
You can find it here:
3) [SCSI] storvsc: Implement multi-channel support
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <email address hidden>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <email address hidden>
has been added to the upstream scsi tree On branch "postmerge"
You can find it here:
4) [SCSI] storvsc: Update the storage protocol to win8 level
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <email address hidden>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <email address hidden>
has been added to the upstream scsi tree On branch "misc"
You can find it here:
5) [SCSI] storvsc: Increase the value of scsi timeout for storvsc devices
The standard scsi timeout is not appropriate in some of the environments where
Hyper-V is deployed. Set this timeout appropriately for all devices managed
by this driver.
On cloud environments where storage latencies may be unbounded, having the
scsi layer initiating recovery can be problematic since (a) the host is
already implementing a variety of recovery strategies and (b) implementing a
recovery strategy at the VM level may be more appropriate in cases where
storage latencies exceed a certain threshold.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <email address hidden>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <email address hidden>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <email address hidden>
has been added to the upstream scsi tree On branch "misc"
You can find it here:
Thanks,
Abhishek
affects: | linux-meta (Ubuntu) → linux (Ubuntu) |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Saucy): | |
assignee: | nobody → Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
tags: | added: saucy |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Saucy): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Saucy): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Retargetting to a public bug.