Please update package fonts-liberation to version 2.00.1

Bug #1196584 reported by Nikolaus Waxweiler
38
This bug affects 8 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
fonts-liberation2 (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
fonts-liberation2 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
Declined for Xenial by Jeremy Bícha

Bug Description

Hello font people,
the newer version is finally under the SIL Open Font License and has much expanded script coverage. Please consider updating the package. The only regression is that Liberation Sans Narrow can't be included for license reasons, so that would have to be extracted from 1.07.

Regards,
Nikolaus

tags: added: upgrade-software-version
Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in fonts-liberation (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Logan Rosen (logan)
Changed in fonts-liberation (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
NoOp (glgxg) wrote :

This was fixed upstream in July 2013... it is now January 2015 - can this package please be updated for Ubuntu?

Revision history for this message
Beni Cherniavsky (cben) wrote :

Yes please! Liberation fonts 2.0 have considerably better unicode coverage.
Example why I care: currently the default Ubuntu install has precisely 1(!) monospace font covering Hebrew (FreeMono) and 1 more comes if I install Hebrew language support (Miriam Mono CLM). Ubuntu font family Hebrew is still far from ready:
So Liberation Mono 2.0's added Hebrew coverage (which to my eyes is prettier than FreeMono or Miriam) is a significant improvement.

If this bug can't move forward for some reason, consider instead including fonts-croscore in default install — more or less the same fonts as Liberation 2.0, under different names (e.g. Cousine has monospace Hebrew coverage).

Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: Fix Released → New
Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) wrote :

This is done for Ubuntu 16.10 (development):

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-liberation/2.00.1-2

Changed in fonts-liberation (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) wrote :

Re-opening this bug since Debian & Ubuntu have reverted back to version 1

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-liberation/1:1.07.4-2

The Debian maintainer mentioned that fonts-liberation version 2 might be packaged in a separate package to allow those who want it to install it.

Changed in fonts-liberation (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → Triaged
Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: Fix Released → New
Changed in fonts-liberation (Debian):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) wrote :

This was fixed by packaging version 2 as fonts-liberation2 in Ubuntu 17.04 Alpha.

This is because the changes in version 2 are controversial and some people prefer the older version.

affects: fonts-liberation (Ubuntu) → fonts-liberation2 (Ubuntu)
Changed in fonts-liberation2 (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
affects: fonts-liberation (Debian) → fonts-liberation2 (Debian)
Revision history for this message
Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) wrote :
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.