mozilla-firefox-gnome-support: fails to uninstall
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mozilla-firefox (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
mozilla-firefox (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Thom May |
Bug Description
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #287355 http://
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Eric Dorland (eric-debian) wrote : Re: Bug#287355: mozilla-firefox-gnome-support: fails to uninstall | #1 |
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Eric Dorland (eric-dorland) wrote : | #2 |
tags 287355 important
thanks
* Alexandre (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:36:01PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Alexandre Fayolle (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> > > Package: mozilla-
> > > Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Justification: fails to uninstall properly
> >
> > Hmm, are uninstallation bugs considered serious?
>
> Not sure about that. Please change the severity if you feel I set it too
> high. It certainly did bug me when I could not uninstall the package and
> it prevented me from installing other packages. Maybe I overreacted.
I think important would be better.
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I cannot uninstall mozilla-
> > >
> > > Removing mozilla-
> > > Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E:
> > > /usr/lib/
> > > present. Registration might have gone wrong.
> > > mv: cannot stat `/usr/lib/
> > > directory
> > > dpkg: error processing mozilla-
> > > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
> > > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > > mozilla-
> > > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> >
> > Did mozilla-firefox install cleanly?
>
> I'm not sure about that. I upgraded firefox to the latest
> release a couple of hours ago, and can no longer reproduce the bug.
> Maybe this was caused by some version difference due to autobuilder lag
> (it happened on an alpha box).
>
> Well... I'm sorry I can't bring more help. Maybe the best course of
> action would be closing the bug report, if you think the maintainer
> scripts for mozilla-
> case where /usr/lib/
>
> Thanks for your patience. And I hope you'll have a nice new year's eve
> celebration. :-)
Well, actually I think the postrm scripts shouldn't die if
update-
release. Thanks.
--
Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: <email address hidden>
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+
G e h! r- y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Eric Dorland (eric-debian) wrote : severity of 287355 is important | #3 |
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
severity 287355 important
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Adrian Bunk (bunk) wrote : uninstallation bugs are RC | #4 |
severity 287355 serious
thanks
It was always clear for me that uninstallation bugs definitely have to
be RC.
Installation bugs are RC, and uninstallation bugs are even worse since
it may take longer util they are discovered.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : | #5 |
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> severity 287355 serious
> thanks
> It was always clear for me that uninstallation bugs definitely have to
> be RC.
> Installation bugs are RC, and uninstallation bugs are even worse since
> it may take longer util they are discovered.
Indeed, being unable to uninstall a package is RC.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #6 |
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #287355 http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-Id: <E1Cirxx-
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:19:05 +0100
From: Alexandre Fayolle <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: mozilla-
Package: mozilla-
Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to uninstall properly
Hi,
I cannot uninstall mozilla-
Removing mozilla-
Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E:
/usr/lib/
present. Registration might have gone wrong.
mv: cannot stat `/usr/lib/
directory
dpkg: error processing mozilla-
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
mozilla-
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-generic
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=
Versions of packages mozilla-
ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.0-4 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.8-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-6 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.3-6 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii mozilla-firefox 1.0-5 lightweight web browser based on M
-- no debconf information
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #8 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:36:01 -0500
From: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
To: Alexandre Fayolle <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#287355: mozilla-
--oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
* Alexandre Fayolle (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-
> Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to uninstall properly
Hmm, are uninstallation bugs considered serious?=20
=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I cannot uninstall mozilla-
>=20
> Removing mozilla-
> Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E:
> /usr/lib/
> present. Registration might have gone wrong.
> mv: cannot stat `/usr/lib/
> directory
> dpkg: error processing mozilla-
> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> mozilla-
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Did mozilla-firefox install cleanly?=20
--=20
Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: <email address hidden>
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+=20
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+=20
G e h! r- y+=20
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB0IBBYem
w3Z9Si9OsnT+
=Iqi/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oJ71EGRlYNjSv
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #9 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:51:41 -0500
From: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
To: Alexandre <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#287355: mozilla-
--rJ8inJ6ig7iY3YX9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
tags 287355 important
thanks
* Alexandre (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:36:01PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Alexandre Fayolle (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> > > Package: mozilla-
> > > Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Justification: fails to uninstall properly
> >=20
> > Hmm, are uninstallation bugs considered serious?=20
>=20
> Not sure about that. Please change the severity if you feel I set it too
> high. It certainly did bug me when I could not uninstall the package and
> it prevented me from installing other packages. Maybe I overreacted.=20
I think important would be better.
> > =20
> > >=20
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > I cannot uninstall mozilla-
> > >=20
> > > Removing mozilla-
> > > Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E:
> > > /usr/lib/
> > > present. Registration might have gone wrong.
> > > mv: cannot stat `/usr/lib/
or
> > > directory
> > > dpkg: error processing mozilla-
> > > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
> > > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > > mozilla-
> > > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> >=20
> > Did mozilla-firefox install cleanly?=20
>=20
> I'm not sure about that. I upgraded firefox to the latest
> release a couple of hours ago, and can no longer reproduce the bug.
> Maybe this was caused by some version difference due to autobuilder lag
> (it happened on an alpha box).=20
>=20
> Well... I'm sorry I can't bring more help. Maybe the best course of
> action would be closing the bug report, if you think the maintainer
> scripts for mozilla-
> case where /usr/lib/
>=20
> Thanks for your patience. And I hope you'll have a nice new year's eve
> celebration. :-)
Well, actually I think the postrm scripts shouldn't die if
update-
release. Thanks.
--=20
Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: <email address hidden>
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+=20
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+=20
G e h! r- y+=20
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--rJ8inJ6ig7iY3YX9
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATU...
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #10 |
Message-Id: <20041231050139
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:01:39 -0500
From: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: severity of 287355 is important
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
severity 287355 important
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #11 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:03:01 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: uninstallation bugs are RC
severity 287355 serious
thanks
It was always clear for me that uninstallation bugs definitely have to
be RC.
Installation bugs are RC, and uninstallation bugs are even worse since
it may take longer util they are discovered.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #12 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:28:03 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: Adrian Bunk <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: uninstallation bugs are RC
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> severity 287355 serious
> thanks
> It was always clear for me that uninstallation bugs definitely have to=20
> be RC.
> Installation bugs are RC, and uninstallation bugs are even worse since=20
> it may take longer util they are discovered.
Indeed, being unable to uninstall a package is RC.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB1cRgKN6
TLG3JmCsnw8tKgw
=WNJ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--s/l3CgOIzMHHj
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Maximiliano Curia (lugfi) wrote : Calls update-mozilla-firefox-chrome on purge | #13 |
Tags 287355 +patch
thanks,
The postrm script calls update-
of mozilla-firefox) on purge, it will fail if the purge of
mozilla-
mozilla-firefox package.
--
"I'd rather listen to [Isaac] Newton than to [MicroSoft's] Mundie. He may
have been dead for almost three hundred years, but despite that he stinks
up the room less." --- (Linus Torvalds)
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #14 |
Message-ID: <20050109161102
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:11:02 -0300
From: Maximiliano Curia <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Calls update-
Tags 287355 +patch
thanks,
The postrm script calls update-
of mozilla-firefox) on purge, it will fail if the purge of
mozilla-
mozilla-firefox package.
--
"I'd rather listen to [Isaac] Newton than to [MicroSoft's] Mundie. He may
have been dead for almost three hundred years, but despite that he stinks
up the room less." --- (Linus Torvalds)
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Paul Brossier (piem) wrote : | #15 |
just checked the following patch works:
# before
$ sudo dpkg --force-depends --purge mozilla-firefox
dpkg: mozilla-firefox: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
mozilla-
(Reading database ... 82173 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-firefox ...
Purging configuration files for mozilla-firefox ...
$ sudo dpkg --purge mozilla-
(Reading database ... 81699 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-
/var/lib/
dpkg: error processing mozilla-
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
mozilla-
# after
$ sudo dpkg --force-depends --purge mozilla-firefox
dpkg: mozilla-firefox: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
mozilla-
(Reading database ... 82172 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-firefox ...
Purging configuration files for mozilla-firefox ...
$ sudo dpkg --purge mozilla-
(Reading database ... 81699 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-
Purging configuration files for mozilla-
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #16 |
Message-ID: <20050110133444
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:34:44 +0000
From: Paul Brossier <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Calls update-
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
just checked the following patch works:
# before
$ sudo dpkg --force-depends --purge mozilla-firefox
dpkg: mozilla-firefox: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
mozilla-
(Reading database ... 82173 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-firefox ...
Purging configuration files for mozilla-firefox ...
$ sudo dpkg --purge mozilla-
(Reading database ... 81699 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-
/var/lib/
dpkg: error processing mozilla-
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
mozilla-
# after
$ sudo dpkg --force-depends --purge mozilla-firefox
dpkg: mozilla-firefox: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
mozilla-
(Reading database ... 82172 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-firefox ...
Purging configuration files for mozilla-firefox ...
$ sudo dpkg --purge mozilla-
(Reading database ... 81699 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing mozilla-
Purging configuration files for mozilla-
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
diff -Nru /tmp/8SIXjj7A0i
--- /tmp/8SIXjj7A0i
+++ /tmp/zQMGs4YDro
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+mozilla-firefox (1.0+dfsg.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * debian/
+ update-
+ (renders package uninstallable) (Closes: #287355)
+
+ -- Paul Brossier <email address hidden> Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:06:32 +0000
+
mozilla-firefox (1.0+dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Not a new upstream release.
diff -Nru /tmp/8SIXjj7A0i
--- /tmp/8SIXjj7A0i
+++ /tmp/zQMGs4YDro
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
case "$1" in
abo...
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Paul Brossier (piem) wrote : | #17 |
same cause same effect, also applying the changes to
debian/
In Debian Bug tracker #287355, Eric Dorland (eric-debian) wrote : Bug#287355: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0+dfsg.1-2 | #18 |
Source: mozilla-firefox
Source-Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mozilla-firefox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eric Dorland <email address hidden> (supplier of updated mozilla-firefox package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:51:10 -0500
Source: mozilla-firefox
Binary: mozilla-firefox mozilla-
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
Description:
mozilla-firefox - lightweight web browser based on Mozilla
mozilla-
mozilla-
Closes: 287355
Changes:
mozilla-firefox (1.0+dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/
debian/
update-
Files:
6ed65016582b07
0e1f2ab17917fd
f9351a51886b72
2d1e899f095fe4
a91d99ca291866
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB4pXzYem
nDzC8zefKMZogQO
=Vb8a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #19 |
Message-ID: <20050110145503
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:55:04 +0000
From: Paul Brossier <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Calls update-
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
same cause same effect, also applying the changes to
debian/
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
filename=
diff -Nru /tmp/YqK9wguHwk
--- /tmp/YqK9wguHwk
+++ /tmp/Rv6sYBhm74
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+mozilla-firefox (1.0+dfsg.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU.
+ * debian/
+ update-
+ removed. (Closes: #287355) same changes applied to
+ debia/mozilla-
+
+ -- Paul Brossier <email address hidden> Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:35:17 +0000
+
mozilla-firefox (1.0+dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Not a new upstream release.
diff -Nru /tmp/YqK9wguHwk
--- /tmp/YqK9wguHwk
+++ /tmp/Rv6sYBhm74
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
case "$1" in
abort-
- update-
+ if [ -x /usr/sbin/
+ /usr/sbin/
+ fi
;;
*)
;;
diff -Nru /tmp/YqK9wguHwk
--- /tmp/YqK9wguHwk
+++ /tmp/Rv6sYBhm74
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
case "$1" in
abort-
- update-
+ if [ -x /usr/sbin/
+ /usr/sbin/
+ fi
;;
*)
;;
--OgqxwSJOaUobr
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #20 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:02:48 -0500
From: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#287355: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0+dfsg.1-2
Source: mozilla-firefox
Source-Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mozilla-firefox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
mozilla-
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eric Dorland <email address hidden> (supplier of updated mozilla-firefox package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:51:10 -0500
Source: mozilla-firefox
Binary: mozilla-firefox mozilla-
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
Description:
mozilla-firefox - lightweight web browser based on Mozilla
mozilla-
mozilla-
Closes: 287355
Changes:
mozilla-firefox (1.0+dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/
debian/
update-
Files:
6ed65016582b07
0e1f2ab17917fd
f9351a51886b72
2d1e899f095fe4
a91d99ca291866
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB4pXzYem
nDzC8zefKMZogQO
=Vb8a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thom May (thombot) wrote : | #21 |
Fixed in upload of firefox 1.0+dfsg.1-2ubuntu1
Changed in mozilla-firefox: | |
status: | Unconfirmed → Fix Released |
Changed in mozilla-firefox: | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
* Alexandre Fayolle (<email address hidden>) wrote: firefox- gnome-support
> Package: mozilla-
> Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to uninstall properly
Hmm, are uninstallation bugs considered serious?
> firefox- gnome-support: firefox- gnome-support ... mozilla- firefox/ extensions/ installed- extensions. txt still mozilla- firefox/ defaults. ini': No such file or firefox- gnome-support (--remove): firefox- gnome-support
> Hi,
>
> I cannot uninstall mozilla-
>
> Removing mozilla-
> Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry...E:
> /usr/lib/
> present. Registration might have gone wrong.
> mv: cannot stat `/usr/lib/
> directory
> dpkg: error processing mozilla-
> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> mozilla-
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Did mozilla-firefox install cleanly?
--
Eric Dorland <email address hidden>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: <email address hidden>
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+
G e h! r- y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------