Limitations page in the doc is out of date
Bug #1166423 reported by
Jay Janssen
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percona XtraDB Cluster moved to https://jira.percona.com/projects/PXC |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Hrvoje Matijakovic | ||
Bug Description
http://
There are several issues with this page. A few examples:
- DELETE unsupported w/o PK -- this is NOT TRUE, though there may be performance impacts
- DDL statements are problematic -- is this really the case? We have a variety of methods to handle DDL
- I'm not convinced it's wise to recommend 10Gb network and SSDs in all cases. The general statement is true, but it doesn't mean 10Gbps will solve it.
Maybe others... Should probably get Codership's take on these as well.
Related branches
lp:~hrvojem/percona-xtradb-cluster/bug1133638
- Raghavendra D Prabhu (community): Approve
-
Diff: 446 lines (+321/-13)7 files modifieddoc-pxc/source/faq.rst (+3/-2)
doc-pxc/source/howtos/cenots_howto.rst (+6/-0)
doc-pxc/source/howtos/ubuntu_howto.rst (+302/-0)
doc-pxc/source/index.rst (+1/-0)
doc-pxc/source/installation.rst (+2/-0)
doc-pxc/source/limitation.rst (+3/-6)
doc-pxc/source/wsrep-system-index.rst (+4/-5)
Revision history for this message
| Raghavendra D Prabhu (raghavendra-prabhu) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| assignee: | nobody → Hrvoje Matijakovic (hrvojem) |
| milestone: | none → 5.5.30-24.8 |
| tags: | added: doc |
Revision history for this message
| Alex Yurchenko (ayurchen) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| status: | Triaged → In Progress |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in percona-xtradb-cluster: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Revision history for this message
| Shahriyar Rzayev (rzayev-sehriyar) wrote | #3 |
To post a comment you must log in.
> DELETE unsupported w/o PK -- this is NOT TRUE, though there may be performance impacts
Agree, it should be supported but with performance impacts.
> DDL statements are problematic -- is this really the case? We have a variety of methods to handle DDL
Agree on this as well, may be a link to the DDL methods can also
be added here.