nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

Bug #1093703 reported by Jānis Kangarooo
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

2nd time already i move or delete files in Nautulis in 1TB fat drive.
It has folders with 2000 and 25000 files.
In 2000 i moved inside folders to sub level and crashed but couldnt get crash couse of some error it said.
In 25000 files i deleted just 100 files and it crashed and gave this error.

Did it finished moving files in 2000 file folder or are they lost couse i now folder from witch i moved all files is empty as it should have been if all file moving was without crash alos..

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-45.101-generic 2.6.32.60+drm33.26
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-45-generic i686
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Dec 26 00:43:17 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429.4)
ProcCmdline: nautilus
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x811d8a1: mov 0xc(%eax),%edx
 PC (0x0811d8a1) ok
 source "0xc(%eax)" (0x0000000c) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%edx" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID ()
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare www-data

Revision history for this message
Jānis Kangarooo (kangarooo) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #968473, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.