perl: [5.8.4-4] FTBFS on mipsel, holding other packages with security holes from sarge
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
perl (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
perl (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
High
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #283320 http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #1 |
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #2 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:25:28 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: perl: [5.8.4-4] FTBFS on mipsel, holding other packages with security holes from sarge
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.4-4
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: holding packages with remote exploitable security holes from
sarge
Perl is not building on MIPSEL, due to test-suite failures. It is holding
packages from sarge that fix security holes that are remotely exploitable,
thus the inflated severity of this bug (instead of the usual "serious"
severity).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28-
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=
Versions of packages perl depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-17 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii perl-base 5.8.4-4 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii perl-modules 5.8.4-4 Core Perl modules
-- no debconf information
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
In Debian Bug tracker #283320, Brendan O'Dea (bod) wrote : Re: Bug#283320: perl: [5.8.4-4] FTBFS on mipsel, holding other packages with security holes from sarge | #3 |
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:25:28AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>Perl is not building on MIPSEL, due to test-suite failures. It is holding
>packages from sarge that fix security holes that are remotely exploitable,
>thus the inflated severity of this bug (instead of the usual "serious"
>severity).
See Bug#273746. This appears to be a problem with the buildd, not perl.
--bod
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #4 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:24:41 +1100
From: Brendan O'Dea <email address hidden>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#283320: perl: [5.8.4-4] FTBFS on mipsel,
holding other packages with security holes from sarge
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:25:28AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>Perl is not building on MIPSEL, due to test-suite failures. It is holding
>packages from sarge that fix security holes that are remotely exploitable,
>thus the inflated severity of this bug (instead of the usual "serious"
>severity).
See Bug#273746. This appears to be a problem with the buildd, not perl.
--bod
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote : | #5 |
mipsel only, and even there not reproducible in a manual build.
In Debian Bug tracker #283320, Andreas Barth (aba) wrote : perl FTBFS on mipsel - status | #6 |
retitle 283320 perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt
thanks
[forwarded from a mail from 2004-12-26 to d-mips, d-perl and others]
Currently (and since 11th May, with last successful built of version
5.8.4-2), perl FTBFS (because of failing tests) on the official mipsel
autobuilders. It however compiles well on other machines. The main
difference seems to be that the remake (the offical machine) is a lasat,
the machine where I tested the compile is a cobalt (as I'm also using
sbuild, the build environment should be more or less the same).
--
http://
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:29:09 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: perl FTBFS on mipsel - status
retitle 283320 perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt
thanks
[forwarded from a mail from 2004-12-26 to d-mips, d-perl and others]
Currently (and since 11th May, with last successful built of version
5.8.4-2), perl FTBFS (because of failing tests) on the official mipsel
autobuilders. It however compiles well on other machines. The main
difference seems to be that the remake (the offical machine) is a lasat,
the machine where I tested the compile is a cobalt (as I'm also using
sbuild, the build environment should be more or less the same).
--
http://
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
In Debian Bug tracker #283320, Paul Hampson (paul-hampson) wrote : Has this FTBFS bug been fixed on mipsel now? | #8 |
This bug appears to have been fixed in July.
remake: 5.8.4-4, failed (12 test failures)
http://
remake: 5.8.4-4, failed (12 test failures)
http://
repeat.rfc822.org: 5.8.4-5, failed (12 test failures)
Presumably the same machine as remake...
http://
remake: 5.8.4-5, failed (12 test failures)
http://
solitude: 5.8.4-6, success
http://
remake: 5.8.4-7, failed (outlier?)
Errno architecture (mipsel-
not match executable architecture
(mipsel-
line 11.
http://
remake: 5.8.4-8, failed (12 test failures)
http://
solitude: 5.8.4-8, success
http://
(Presumably remake was rebuilt and became rem here?)
rem: 5.8.7-2, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed)
http://
rem: 5.8.7-3, success
http://
rem: 5.8.7-4, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed)
http://
rem: 5.8.7-4, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed)
http://
rem: 5.8.7-4, success
http://
rem: 5.8.7-5, success
http://
So it appears to me that this FTBFS bug filed against remake can be
closed, as the machine in question has been either rebuilt or retired.
I haven't actually done anything to this bug as there may be more going
on here than I'm aware of, but from what I can see this isn't a bug in
perl, but an issue with the buildd that has since been solved.
(If remake and repeat are seperate machines, then there's at least
something repeatable across machines here.)
If it was/is an issue with the buildd, then the 12-test failure first
appears in 5.8.4-2.2 on 2004-09-07, and last appears 2005-03-08, and the
t/op/fork test failure first appears 2005-06-07 and was last seen
2005-07-11 (and a rebuild 10 hours later on the same machine didn't
fail, so if this was an issue, it may have been fixed that day?)
(The 12 tests failing earlier don't include t/op/fork, BTW)
--
Paul "TBBle" Ham...
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #9 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:55:51 +1000
From: Paul TBBle Hampson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Has this FTBFS bug been fixed on mipsel now?
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
This bug appears to have been fixed in July.
remake: 5.8.4-4, failed (12 test failures)
http://
stamp=3D1099771
remake: 5.8.4-4, failed (12 test failures)
http://
stamp=3D1101291
repeat.rfc822.org: 5.8.4-5, failed (12 test failures)
Presumably the same machine as remake...
http://
stamp=3D1102820
remake: 5.8.4-5, failed (12 test failures)
http://
stamp=3D1103895
solitude: 5.8.4-6, success
http://
stamp=3D1107362
remake: 5.8.4-7, failed (outlier?)
Errno architecture (mipsel-
not match executable architecture
(mipsel-
line 11.
http://
stamp=3D1110208
remake: 5.8.4-8, failed (12 test failures)
http://
stamp=3D1110314
solitude: 5.8.4-8, success
http://
stamp=3D1110579
(Presumably remake was rebuilt and became rem here?)
rem: 5.8.7-2, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed)
http://
stamp=3D1118196
rem: 5.8.7-3, success
http://
stamp=3D1118273
rem: 5.8.7-4, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed)
http://
stamp=3D1120885
rem: 5.8.7-4, failed (only one test, t/op/fork, failed)
http://
stamp=3D1121067
rem: 5.8.7-4, success
http://
stamp=3D1121104
rem: 5.8.7-5, success
http://
stamp=3D1126486
So it appears to me that this FTBFS bug filed against remake can be
closed, as the machine in question has been either rebuilt or retired.
I haven't actually done anything to this bug as there may be more going
on here than I'm aware of, but from what I can see this isn't a bug in
perl, but an issue with t...
In Debian Bug tracker #283320, Paul Hampson (paul-hampson) wrote : Still building fine on rem | #10 |
rem: 5.8.7-6, success
http://
--
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, <email address hidden>
8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #11 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:09:02 +1000
From: Paul TBBle Hampson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Still building fine on rem
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
rem: 5.8.7-6, success
http://
stamp=3D1129187
--=20
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, <email address hidden>
8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: application/
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDUzHuexD
+8N5cY3TYoFxvAp
=j79k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--sdtB3X0nJg68C
In Debian Bug tracker #283320, Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : Re: perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt | #12 |
Closing, as suggested in the bug log, as a non-bug (buggy buildd, not buggy
package).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #13 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:12:21 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt
--AQYPrgrEUc/1pSX1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
Closing, as suggested in the bug log, as a non-bug (buggy buildd, not buggy
package).
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://
--AQYPrgrEUc/1pSX1
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDsSGVKN6
4ekdXR/
=iu/F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AQYPrgrEUc/
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #283320 http:// bugs.debian. org/283320