rhythmbox-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_value()

Bug #1049372 reported by Arun Joseph
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Program crashes after updating to 12.04 and also after updating to 12.10 beta.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: rhythmbox 2.97-1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-14.15-generic 3.5.3
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-14-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.5.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Sep 11 14:22:47 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/rhythmbox/rhythmbox-metadata
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120425)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/rhythmbox/rhythmbox-metadata unix:tmpdir=/tmp
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f4ed298f3d8 <g_type_check_value+56>: testb $0x8,0x16(%rbx)
 PC (0x7f4ed298f3d8) ok
 source "$0x8" ok
 destination "0x16(%rbx)" (0x1000000e6) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: rhythmbox
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_check_value () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 gst_value_init_and_copy () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
 gst_structure_copy () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
Title: rhythmbox-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_value()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-09-11 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Arun Joseph (ajoseps) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #838812, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.