gvfsd-gphoto2 crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

Bug #1045232 reported by Typhoe
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi,

this crash occurs when I connect my android phone Samsung Galaxy S3.
My phone is set in mtp mode.

Sep 3 09:42:42 typhoe-OptiPlex-780 kernel: [ 70.376144] usb 1-4.2: new high-speed USB device number 5 using ehci_hcd
Sep 3 09:42:42 typhoe-OptiPlex-780 kernel: [ 70.469062] usb 1-4.2: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, idProduct=6860
Sep 3 09:42:42 typhoe-OptiPlex-780 kernel: [ 70.469067] usb 1-4.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3, SerialNumber=4
Sep 3 09:42:42 typhoe-OptiPlex-780 kernel: [ 70.469070] usb 1-4.2: Product: GT-I9300
Sep 3 09:42:42 typhoe-OptiPlex-780 kernel: [ 70.469072] usb 1-4.2: Manufacturer: samsung

Just before I plugged the phone, I added a rule to udev (and restarted it):
/etc/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules
SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="04e8", ATTR{IDPRODUCT}=="6860", MODE="0666", GROUP="plugdev"

regards.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: gvfs-backends 1.13.7-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-13.14-generic 3.5.3
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.5.1-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Sep 3 11:18:04 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-gphoto2
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha amd64 (20120830)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-gphoto2 --spawner :1.7 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/2
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
Title: gvfsd-gphoto2 crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Typhoe (spamistrash) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #984993, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.