i386 install ubuntu server (netboot image, from usb): no wired network after install [incorrect name in interfaces file]

Bug #1041838 reported by Redmar
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned
ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

After installing installing ubuntu server via the netboot image I get no (wired) internet connection on this hardware: https://launchpad.net/+hwdb/+fingerprint/b845c366ea09c60efa3a45c1b5b21525

Please let me know what other information you need to investigate this further.

Tags: iso-testing
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu QA Website (ubuntuqa) wrote :

This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.

A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1041838

tags: added: iso-testing
Revision history for this message
Redmar (redmar) wrote :

The problem appears to be that my wired network device is seen as 'em10' during the installation, but as eth0 after the install.

I've attached the relevant lines from /etc/network/interfaces

summary: - i368 netboot install ubuntu server: no wired network after install
+ i386 netboot install ubuntu server: no wired network after install
summary: i386 netboot install ubuntu server: no wired network after install
+ [incorrect name in interfaces file]
Revision history for this message
Redmar (redmar) wrote : Re: i386 netboot install ubuntu server: no wired network after install [incorrect name in interfaces file]

I've just done a netboot install of kubuntu, it has working network after reboot and the following lines in /etc/network/interfaces:

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The primary network interface
#NetworkManager#auto em10
#NetworkManager#iface em10 inet dhcp

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote :

Ah. This is a new feature, not a bug =)

Please read:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2012-August/035670.html

Revision history for this message
Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) wrote :

Please change this bug to confirmed or file a new bug if there is something missing from the ubuntu-devel instructions.

Changed in debian-installer (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Dave Gilbert (ubuntu-treblig) wrote :

OK, so the name in the file is correct - but the network name doesn't match - why?

Questions:
  1) Did you preseed?
  2) What's your pxe config
  3) Is the biosdevname package installed ? If it isn't then what happens if you install it - does it pick the right name up?

I'm suspecting the problem is biosdevname hasn't been installed, and hence it doesn't get renamed to em10.

Dave

Revision history for this message
Redmar (redmar) wrote :

1) No, I just used the default latest build for netboot, found here http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/21555/downloads
2) I don't think I'm using pxe, I'm installing from usb with the image linked in 1)
3) biosdevname was not installed, but installing it and rebooting did not solve the problem.

I'm also marking the bug as confirmed since I'm not doing a preseeded installation, so afaik, the ubuntu-devel instructions do not apply.

Revision history for this message
Dave Gilbert (ubuntu-treblig) wrote :

Ah ok - so the title is a bit wrong; you're not actually netbooting, you're just using the netboot image locally

Changed in debian-installer (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
summary: - i386 netboot install ubuntu server: no wired network after install
- [incorrect name in interfaces file]
+ i386 install ubuntu server (netboot image, from usb): no wired network
+ after install [incorrect name in interfaces file]
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.