Palimpsest warns about misalignment of extended partition

Bug #1034609 reported by Jon Hanna
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

On a drive that requires 64-byte alignment, palimpsest complains if an extended partition is misaligned, suggesting repartitioning.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this irrelevant with an extended partition, only mattering with physical and logical partitions?

The warning certainly looks alarming. It definitely looks like I should be fixing things as a matter of urgency! Unless I'm wrong in my understanding that this is harmless, the warning should be removed in such cases.

Revision history for this message
Garry Trethewey (garrytreth) wrote :

+1

WARNING: The partition is misaligned by nnnn bytes. This may result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested.

On a 1TB SATA disk I used gparted to set up the following

Partition
100GB NTFS
70TB Ext3
2TB swap
828GB extended

Used Disk Utility to delete all, then used Disk Utility to repartition, got

Partition nnnn
100GB NTFS 512
70TB Ext3 1024
2TB swap 2048
828GB extended 512

any ideas?

Jon Hanna (jonhanna)
Changed in gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Joost Ringoot (joost) wrote :

I found that it is possible to resolve all non-alignment issues by resizing the problem partitions a bit with gparted, using a live-cd.
The only partition where gparted fails to do this, is the FAT16 Dell diagnostics partition. Gparted ends with a numerical error on this (Which have not noted down and the problem machine is no longer with me).

Nevertheless, I am convinced this is a bug in the Ubuntu installer system, since I have let the ubuntu installer do the automagic find space and resize partitions himself without any manual interaction.

Revision history for this message
Joost Ringoot (joost) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Joost Ringoot (joost) wrote :

for FAT16 resize I get this error in gparted= "Filesystem doesn't have the expected sizes for Windows to like it. Cluster size is 2k( 1k expected); number of clusters is 20017 (39957 expected); size of FATs is 79 sectors(157 expected).

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.