apturl-gtk crashed with TypeError in __init__(): __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Bug #1023219 reported by Matthew McGowan
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apturl (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Attempted to install Folder sharing services by going through the nautilus/gnome gui.

Steps to reproduce:
1. In Nautilus: right-click a folder icon
2. Select 'Sharing Options'
3. Check 'Share this Folder'
4. See "sharing services not install dialog"
5. Click "Install Service"

Result:
Fault occurs, both "sharing service failed to install" and "Sorry Ubuntu has experiences and internal error" dialogs display...

Expected:
Service must install and user must be able to share folder(s) over network.

Thanks in advance.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: apturl 0.5.1ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-4.4-generic 3.5.0-rc6
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-4-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.3-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jul 11 12:52:42 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/apturl-gtk
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha amd64 (20120627)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.2mu
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/apturl-gtk apt:samba,libpam-smbpass
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/apturl-gtk', 'apt:samba,libpam-smbpass']
SourcePackage: apturl
Title: apturl-gtk crashed with TypeError in __init__(): __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Matthew McGowan (mmcg069) wrote :
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1020980, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.