reverse geocoding provides wrong adress

Bug #1021472 reported by Markus Semm
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
openMarkers
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/reverse?format=xml&lat=52.497648&lon=13.348039&zoom=18&addressdetails=1

reports

<reversegeocode timestamp="Thu, 05 Jul 12 16:24:24 -0400" attribution="Data Copyright OpenStreetMap Contributors, Some Rights Reserved. CC-BY-SA 2.0." querystring="format=xml&lat=52.497648&lon=13.348039&zoom=18&addressdetails=1">
<result place_id="20357888" osm_type="way" osm_id="13762438" lat="52.4914636202577" lon="13.3441644099508">
U4, Berchtesgadener Straße, Schöneberg, Tempelhof-Schöneberg, Berlin, Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf, Berlin, 10779
</result>
<addressparts>
<subway>U4</subway>
<road>Berchtesgadener Straße</road>
<suburb>Schöneberg</suburb>
<city_district>Tempelhof-Schöneberg</city_district>
<city>Berlin</city>
<county>Berlin</county>
<region>Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf</region>
<state>Berlin</state>
<boundary>10779</boundary>
<country_code>de</country_code>
</addressparts>
</reversegeocode>

The street name "Berchtesgardener Strasse exists in the same area but there are multiple well tagged streets which are closer and which have a different name.

This seems to be a reverse geocoding but.

Revision history for this message
costales (costales) wrote :

Thanks Markus for your feedback! :)
I don't know where you get that report. Please, could you tell me the steps? :)
Thanks in advance!

Revision history for this message
Markus Semm (msemm) wrote :

I tried 2 different sources with the same result:

1) our own NOMINATIM server:
http://nominatim.enaikoon.de/reverse?format=xml&lat=52.497648&lon=13.348039&zoom=18&addressdetails=1

2) the MAPQUEST service:
http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/reverse?format=xml&lat=52.497648&lon=13.348039&zoom=18&addressdetails=1

Due to your feedback I also tried the OSM-version:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/reverse?format=xml&lat=52.497648&lon=13.348039&zoom=18&addressdetails=1
This provided the correct result.

Does that mean that 1) and 2) are not running the latest version of NOMINATIM?

Revision history for this message
costales (costales) wrote :

Hi Markus :)
I think you're referring to something earlier, but I do not know what it is.
openMarkers isn't using a reverse geocoding, it is just using the search nominating:
http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/search.php
Please, could you put me in context? :)
Thanks in advance!

Revision history for this message
Markus Semm (msemm) wrote :

Sorry Costales,
I do not get your point.

My issue is very simple:

I requested a reverse geocoding from 2 different NOMINATIM sources and got the same but wrong result.
Later I tested the OSM Nominatim reverse geocoding with the same data and it worked fine.

I do NOT refer to anything earlier.

I think it is the best to close this ticket.
It seems not to be the correct place here for it.

Thx for your help anyway
Markus

Revision history for this message
costales (costales) wrote :

Thanks Markus. I think the right place for this bug is here: http://ur1.ca/9r1q8
Best regards.

Changed in openmarkers:
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.