Ubuntu
faac package

package libfaac0 1.28-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libfaac0 is already installed and configured

Bug #1001701 reported by Pedro António Soares on 2012-05-19

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #541595: [Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and configured. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	faac (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libfaac0 1.28-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat May 19 17:41:04 2012
DuplicateSignature:
Unpacking replacement libk3b6-extracodecs ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
dpkg: error processing libfaac0 (--configure):
package libfaac0 is already installed and configured
ErrorMessage: package libfaac0 is already installed and configured
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120425)
SourcePackage: faac
Title: package libfaac0 1.28-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package libfaac0 is already installed and configured
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Pedro António Soares (pedro-sara) wrote on 2012-05-19:

AptOrdering.txt Edit (396 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (448 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Df.txt Edit (408 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dmesg.txt Edit (69.9 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgHistoryLog.txt Edit (112.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgTerminalLog.gz Edit (42.7 KiB, application/x-gzip)

Apport retracing service (apport) on 2012-05-19

tags:

removed: need-duplicate-check

Revision history for this message

Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote on 2012-05-19:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 541595, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.