Allow deeper plots
Bug #783092 reported by
Ross Younger
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brot2 |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Ross Younger | ||
| 0.5-beta |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
| 1.0-gamma |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Ross Younger | ||
| 2.0-delta |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Ross Younger | ||
Bug Description
This probably means abstracting it out.
rjk has some fixed-point assembler code. We might also use GMP/CLN/MPFR.
Could we swap multiple maths modules in/out dynamically and still keep performance? Possibly, if we use traits.
After some thought, I couldn't figure out a reliable way to predict a good MINIMUM_PIXEL_SIZE for different FP types; try the epsilon value at 3.0 but be prepared to rejig.
| Changed in brot2: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in brot2: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Revision history for this message
| Ross Younger (crazyscot) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in brot2: | |
| importance: | Medium → Undecided |
| Changed in brot2: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
| status: | Triaged → New |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| description: | updated |
| description: | updated |
| description: | updated |
Revision history for this message
| Ross Younger (crazyscot) wrote | #2 |
To post a comment you must log in.
This might be best done as part of the fractals-by-formula blueprint which will completely overhaul the maths engine.