Better way to keep the lists of fractals and palettes?
Bug #789693 reported by
Ross Younger
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brot2 |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ross Younger | ||
| 0.0-alpha |
Won't Fix
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
| 0.5-beta |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Ross Younger | ||
Bug Description
The current FractalRegistry and PaletteRegistry system seems efficient, but fell over when libbrot2 became a static library - there was nothing to force the fractals, themselves file-scope objects instantiated at static constructor time, to be linked. So far there is an ugly hack in place to do so, but on reflection it strikes me that there must be a way to redesign this. It perhaps involves doing away with the file-scope objects altogether, or a neater way of bringing them in.
| Changed in brot2: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Ross Younger (crazyscot) |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
Revision history for this message
| Ross Younger (crazyscot) wrote | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Ross Younger (crazyscot) wrote | #2 |
Revision history for this message
| Ross Younger (crazyscot) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in brot2: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
The aforementioned ugly hack is change 3574749d6ea3183