Comment 2 for bug 1376469

John Wood (john-wood-w) wrote :

Yeah, this 'UUID for no name' behavior goes back to the early days of the project, and seems to violate principle of least surprise a bit, esp. since it is non-querable. I don't believe this behavior was ever documented as part of the API contract as well. Therefore I'd support removing this behavior altogether and keeping the secret name field optional.