Baltix
gimp package

  1. Bug #157642
  2. Comment #27

Comment 27 for bug 157642

Revision history for this message
Scott Beamer (angrykeyboarder) wrote : Re: [Bug 157642] Re: gimp 2.4 *final* in gutsy

dAniel hAhler spake thusly:
> I've asked on #ubuntu-devel about whether we should provide the stable release through -updates or -backports.
> The consensus has been that there should be a list of high-impact (SRU-able) bugs and only those should then get addressed.
> "Having a release candidate is not professional" is apparently no argument really.

That's *not* what he said. It's not a "release candidate", it's a
"release conadidate". Please re--read. What do you suppose the devs
would think of a "Release Conadidate"? I think it's rather
unprofessional (not unlike "dAniel hAhler" vs "Daniel Hahler".....).

--
             Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved