Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOME New Main Menu |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
One Hundred Papercuts |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Baltix |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Ubuntu |
Fix Released
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
I initially discussed this in the IdeaPool (https:/
As you can see in my IdeaPool post, I did not understand the differences between some of the applications in "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration". For example, "System => Administration => Printing" and "System => Preferences => Default Printer" seemed redundant. I did not understand why I could set my password with both "System => Preferences => About Me" and "System => Administration => Users and Groups". OuattaraAziz explained to me that the applications under Preferences can be accessed by anyone, while applications under Administration can only be accessed by the administrator. Because I have only one account, I did not realize this.
My point is this: For anyone who has only one account (presumably most people), some of the applications in "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" seem redundant, thus leading to confusion. To clarify the purposes of the applications, the launchers need more appropriate names. For example, I think it would make sense to rename "Preferences => Default Printer" to "Set Default Printer". At the same time, "Administration => Printing" could be renamed to "Manage System Printers" or something like that. I think that generally, the names of the launchers under "Preferences" should emphasize the words "Set" and "Modify" whereas the names of launchers under "Administration" should emphasize the words "Manage", "System", "Global", and things like that. Doing so would greatly help the user to understand the differences between the applications.
description: | updated |
Changed in gnome-main-menu: | |
status: | New → Invalid |
tags: | added: usability |
Hello,
I totally agree with this naming convention you are proposing.
I also think the menu items seem redundant .
Thanks for opening this bug.