Activity log for bug #1047067

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2012-09-06 21:53:35 Omer Akram bug added bug
2012-09-06 21:53:35 Omer Akram attachment added Screenshot from 2012-09-07 02:52:22.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047067/+attachment/3296981/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-09-07%2002%3A52%3A22.png
2012-09-06 21:53:53 Omer Akram affects compiz compiz (Ubuntu)
2012-09-06 21:54:07 Omer Akram bug task added ayatana-design
2012-09-07 00:29:51 Edward Donovan bug added subscriber Edward Donovan
2012-09-07 10:50:58 Sam Spilsbury compiz (Ubuntu): status New In Progress
2012-09-07 10:51:04 Sam Spilsbury compiz (Ubuntu): assignee Sam Spilsbury (smspillaz)
2012-09-07 10:51:17 Sam Spilsbury bug added subscriber Ubuntu Release Team
2012-09-07 10:51:30 Sam Spilsbury summary [regression] workspace switcher layout needs adjustments [FFE][UIFE][regression] workspace switcher layout needs adjustments
2012-09-07 10:54:22 Omer Akram compiz (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Medium
2012-09-08 09:37:14 Sam Spilsbury description Workspace switcher layout should centralized as it was in 12.04. currently it looks like as attached in the screenshot. Workspace switcher layout should centralized as it was in 12.04. currently it looks like as attached in the screenshot. == CHANGE == A distro patch from 12.04 didn't get ported over. It was ported to use the new compiz API when linaro released their version of compiz for 12.04, so I've taken this patch as it was and applied it. A few changes were made to get the code under test. == TEST == Unit tests are included, they don't cover a very large amount of the code (many changes in the diff are as a result of refactoring some larger functions into smaller ones, and these changes are not trivially testable). The tests that are there they do cover functionality which is substantially new, such as the code to calculate the spread view offset in world co-ordinate space (60 tests) and the code to determine which viewports should be lit (5 tests). == WHY == If we don't have this patch, we'll regress significantly from 12.04 in a way that is easily avoidable. == REGRESSIONS? == Not anything substantial from 12.04, the only potential is regressions that might stem from the subsequent changes to get the code under test (however I found that doing this caught a lot more potential bugs).
2012-09-08 09:38:36 Sam Spilsbury branch linked lp:~smspillaz/compiz/ubuntu.fix_1047067
2012-09-10 13:50:42 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:~timo-jyrinki/compiz/ubuntu.0982
2012-09-11 13:53:03 Timo Jyrinki branch unlinked lp:~smspillaz/compiz/ubuntu.fix_1047067
2012-09-11 14:02:06 Timo Jyrinki branch linked lp:~smspillaz/compiz/ubuntu.fix_1047067
2012-09-13 07:37:04 Timo Jyrinki branch unlinked lp:~smspillaz/compiz/ubuntu.fix_1047067
2012-09-13 07:37:23 Timo Jyrinki branch linked lp:~compiz-team/compiz/ubuntu.fix_1049596
2012-09-13 07:37:39 Timo Jyrinki branch unlinked lp:~timo-jyrinki/compiz/ubuntu.0982
2012-09-13 07:37:46 Timo Jyrinki branch linked lp:~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu/quantal/compiz/fix_expo
2012-09-21 05:29:26 Launchpad Janitor compiz (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Released
2012-10-02 21:48:15 Carsten Gerlach tags ffe uife
2012-10-11 02:39:12 Scott Kitterman removed subscriber Ubuntu Release Team