| 2007-08-04 13:22:28 |
AdrianvV |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2007-08-04 13:34:21 |
Miika-Petteri Matikainen |
awn: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2007-08-04 13:34:21 |
Miika-Petteri Matikainen |
awn: importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
| 2007-08-04 13:34:21 |
Miika-Petteri Matikainen |
awn: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2007-08-06 20:37:45 |
Garoth |
awn: assignee |
|
garoth |
|
| 2007-08-06 20:37:45 |
Garoth |
awn: statusexplanation |
|
I'll try to do this, but I'm planning to do it differently than it may be done. Rather than finding where the extra call is, I will attempt to make it so that the function can distinguish between its lock on the effect and a different lock that is named the same thing. If it finds a lock is already in place (for the different effect with the same name), it will obey the lock and not run the effect. |
|
| 2007-08-09 14:31:08 |
haytjes |
awn: statusexplanation |
I'll try to do this, but I'm planning to do it differently than it may be done. Rather than finding where the extra call is, I will attempt to make it so that the function can distinguish between its lock on the effect and a different lock that is named the same thing. If it finds a lock is already in place (for the different effect with the same name), it will obey the lock and not run the effect. |
|
|
| 2007-08-15 11:30:57 |
Miika-Petteri Matikainen |
awn: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2007-08-15 11:30:57 |
Miika-Petteri Matikainen |
awn: statusexplanation |
|
Thanks for the patch Michal. Committed to trunk. |
|
