Comment 1 for bug 1626994

The fact that it works on mkcl (does it not?) Makes me suspect a bug in ECL.

If you (or someone) is interested in debugging, I suggest starting by taking snapshots of the files at stake after the first pass, and comparing to the files after the second pass: which are wrong? Also, tracing ecl's run-program or hwhichever way it invokes compilers and linkers. And if there's nothing wrong, instrumenting ECL to not delete the C and header files it creates, to see if they are correct the second time around.