Seth, the service starts fine if snapd is not installed and the mountpoint is not present. $ sudo systemctl status apparmor ● apparmor.service - Load AppArmor profiles Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/apparmor.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (exited) since Wed 2020-04-08 07:05:57 CDT; 3min 9s ago Docs: man:apparmor(7) https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/wikis/home/ Process: 309 ExecStart=/lib/apparmor/apparmor.systemd reload (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 309 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Apr 08 07:05:58 sec-focal-amd64 apparmor.systemd[309]: Restarting AppArmor Apr 08 07:05:58 sec-focal-amd64 apparmor.systemd[309]: Reloading AppArmor profiles Apr 08 07:05:58 sec-focal-amd64 apparmor.systemd[320]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox Apr 08 07:05:58 sec-focal-amd64 apparmor.systemd[325]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd Warning: journal has been rotated since unit was started, output may be incomplete. The service is not delayed on boot: $ sudo systemd-analyze critical-chain apparmor.service The time when unit became active or started is printed after the "@" character. The time the unit took to start is printed after the "+" character. apparmor.service +183ms └─local-fs.target @526ms └─run-user-125-gvfs.mount @6.196s └─run-user-125.mount @5.831s └─local-fs-pre.target @526ms └─keyboard-setup.service @195ms +330ms └─systemd-journald.socket @173ms └─system.slice @170ms └─-.slice @170ms Compare this with before snapd was removed: $ sudo systemd-analyze critical-chain apparmor.service The time when unit became active or started is printed after the "@" character. The time the unit took to start is printed after the "+" character. apparmor.service +278ms └─local-fs.target @1.073s └─run-user-125-gvfs.mount @10.509s └─run-user-125.mount @9.900s └─local-fs-pre.target @756ms └─keyboard-setup.service @369ms +386ms └─systemd-journald.socket @334ms └─system.slice @329ms └─-.slice @329ms The systemd documentation (https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html) say: "RequiresMountsFor: Takes a space-separated list of absolute paths. Automatically adds dependencies of type Requires= and After= for all mount units required to access the specified path." Furthermore, I read the systemd code and for each RequiresMountsFor entry, it will start with the entry, then see if there are mount entries for each path going up to '/', only adding the Requires and After if there is a .mount unit (that it may have synthesized from /etc/fstab) for this path. Eg: snapd is not installed, systemd will: * check if /var/lib/snapd/apparmor/profiles .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib/snapd/apparmor .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib/snapd .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if / .mount entry exists. yes, so add this (will be satisfied by local-fs.target) snapd is installed with no zfs-on-root, systemd will: * check if /var/lib/snapd/apparmor/profiles .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib/snapd/apparmor .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib/snapd .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if / .mount entry exists. yes, so add this (will be satisfied by local-fs.target) snapd is installed with zfs-on-root, systemd will: * check if /var/lib/snapd/apparmor/profiles .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib/snapd/apparmor .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib/snapd .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if /var/lib .mount entry exists. yes, so add this * check if /var .mount entry exists. no, so do nothing * check if / .mount entry exists. yes, so add this (will be satisfied by local-fs.target)