So basically what you are proposing is that subprocesses are started with a command line flag and the bootstrap mechanism of the children should pick that up or is it that the API should have a 'weird_deployment' flag that basically does the bootstrapping of children processes in a different way?
So basically what you are proposing is that subprocesses are started with a command line flag and the bootstrap mechanism of the children should pick that up or is it that the API should have a 'weird_deployment' flag that basically does the bootstrapping of children processes in a different way?