Have tryed this with 7 different clients , none has a prob with sending that INF after the users verification, seems its only the pinger that not replys on the ISID, have posted a support ticket on dchublist.
Access.lua does seems completely correct now.
IF the protocol not specifies that the IINF must be send first, then the pinger is wrong.
Just a warning using this rev 544 will cause the hub the disappear from the hublist .... , will post answer from hublist here :)
Have tryed this with 7 different clients , none has a prob with sending that INF after the users verification, seems its only the pinger that not replys on the ISID, have posted a support ticket on dchublist.
Access.lua does seems completely correct now.
IF the protocol not specifies that the IINF must be send first, then the pinger is wrong.
Just a warning using this rev 544 will cause the hub the disappear from the hublist .... , will post answer from hublist here :)